-
Language
English
About Dr Tim Sgouromitis
Add and update information about your practice, qualifications, professional interests, so that your patients see the most relevant and reliable data. Click Edit Profile to add or update the required information.
Practice in Calgary, AB
- Practice name
- Address FOOTHILLS HOSPITAL, DEPT OF PSYCHIATRY, 257C-1403 29 ST NW, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2N 2T9
- City Calgary, AB
- Province Alberta
Kumaren govender
• 27 April 2022Dr sgourgmitis is criminal physician and how I personal new
Did criminal things
“In my case he would say sexual abuse and the outting of the ‘star metro criminal Alberta medical system’ never happened in 2012”
Stating that’s his opinions that he had zero proof mattered more then
Reality evidence
Has blacked listed information on me
Forced medication ground up in water
Causing a medical comatose
“He support people in the criminal Alberta medical system”
No matter what
These are the legal laws for my civil case against ahs they undermines justice
Over reality to a h s physicians opinions
C-46: “no one can’t be ignorant of Canadian law”
Bill 201- patient rights
Criminal code public mischief/ lying to police officers/ obstruction of justice
140 (1), (a) (b) (c) (d)
Perjury 131
Fabricating evidence 137
Obstruction of justice 139 (2)
Under bill-201 patient bill of rights
(2) “dignity and respect “ & (3) “improved communication with care”
Charters of rights
Section 7, 9, 10, 12
“Cruel and unusual punishment and detention”
“ guardianship and trusteeship”: “for decision making”
-Division 6 protective measures
74(1) “believes risk or harm”
Bill c 36: protector “duel role” 8(1), 13(1)(a)(b), 19 (1)(2)
“as prostitution in Canada agrees” in layman terms, “I’m allowed protect myself by any means From abusers”; “Lying to the police creating obstruction of justice…as well committing false reality reporting by ahs case worker adam Harrison and act team”
Therefore, I am able to reopen the civil case trial. From the perjury charges, zero wittiness called and evidence, that would of changed the civil court judge decisions
Bill c 36: protector “duel role” 8(1), 13(1)(a)(b), 19 (1)(2)
“as prostitution in Canada agrees” in layman terms
“I’m allowed protect myself by any means”
“For abusers”
-“The civil court did accept all bill c 36 evidence”